Asian Boxing C'ships: Sakshi Choudhary loses final spot after opponent's successful bout review
For Printing Download Epaper from files section from bottom of this page
Sakshi had prevailed 3-2 in the regulation bout against top-seeded Dina Zholaman but the decision was challenged by the Kazakh team Indian boxer Sakshi Choudhary (54kg) has lost her final spot in the Asian Championships after her rival, top-seeded Kazakh Dina Zholaman, successfully challenged the narrow victory that the two-time youth world champion had clinched in the last-four stage. Sakshi had prevailed 3-2 in the regulation bout but the decision was challenged by the Kazakh team and eventually overturned.
"Kazakhstan's Dina Zholaman defeated India's SakshiChoudhary at the women's bantamweight (54kg)," the Asian Boxing Confederation announced.
Zholaman was the declared winner in the official result sheet that came out at the end of the day's proceedings late on Thursday night."The Kazakh team sought a review of the third round, which it felt should have been scored in favor of their boxer. On review, the jury found their contention to be correct and overturned the original verdict," a source in the Indian contingent told PTI. The bout review system was introduced by the International Boxing Association (AIBA) in 2019."She is a bit upset by understands that the fight was very close. I told her that she is young and has to prepare for the 2024 Olympics. I was angry about how things panned out. Sakshi is much better now," Indian women's boxing's High-Performance Director RaffaeleBergamasco told PTI. The team manager or the head coach of the losing boxer gets 15 minutes after the decision is announced to submit their protest and complete the paperwork for it in the next 30 minutes. Decisions with scores 5-0 or 4-1 are not reviewable under this system. Each team is allowed up to two failed reviews.
"If the Technical Delegate determines, after consulting the Bout Review Jury, that the protest should be allowed to proceed, the bout will be reviewed by the Jury - the Observer, the Referee Evaluator and the Judge Evaluator," the AIBA had said. In case of a protest claiming that an AIBA technical rule was violated by the referee, the aggrieved team has to specify the breach, the round in which it allegedly took place, and how it affected the final result.